home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group96a.txt
/
000155_icon-group-sender _Thu Jul 11 13:06:27 1996.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1996-09-05
|
1KB
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 13:06:27 MST
From: icon-group-sender
Message-Id: <199607112006.AA10303@cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu>
Received: by cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu; Thu, 11 Jul 1996 13:06:27 MST
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
Apparently-To: icon-group-addresses
Status: O
already) completely locks the color palette, so I can't build my image,
unless I use the precise same palette.
The only `solution' I've found is to process the image for what it is:
a stream of numeric data, not to be loaded in memory as an image for any
reason---ludicrous.
Unless I've missed something, I think that some better facility for
handling color bitmaps would be needed. I don't know, the ability to
declare explicit color palettes, and some simple color-mapping algorithm
for CopyArea between `incompatible' bitmaps would be nice.
I believe that most of the facility is already present---considering color
palettes---the ability to have user defined palettes would be crucial.
--
[nosave]<http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/espie/index.html>
microsoft network is EXPLICITLY forbidden to redistribute this message.
`Seiza no matataki kazoe, uranau koi no yuku e.'
Marc Espie (Marc.Espie@ens.fr)